Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Vestas Joins With Mitsubishi for Offshore Turbines

Written By Unknown on Senin, 30 September 2013 | 15.49

LONDON — The Danish wind turbine manufacturer Vestas received a financial lift on Friday as it announced a joint venture with Mitsubishi Heavy Industry of Japan to develop offshore wind energy.

While Vestas is the world's largest maker of wind turbines, along with General Electric, it has been slow to move into the market for offshore turbines. That has allowed Siemens in Europe to gain an expanding share of the small but fast-growing sector.

The Vestas joint venture with Mitsubishi will develop the Danish company's 8-megawatt offshore turbines, each of which can power roughly 8,000 households. The two companies had been in discussions about a deal for over a year.

Under the terms of the deal, Mitsubishi will invest an initial 100 million euros ($135 million) in the venture, and a further 200 million euros if undisclosed financial targets are met. Vestas and Mitsubishi will initially own equal stakes in the business, but Mitsubishi will have the right to increase its stake to 51 percent beginning in 2016.

Vestas has faced a series of financial difficulties in recent years as it grappled with heightened competition from low-cost Asian rivals and reduced government subsidies for onshore wind power.

The company ousted Ditlev Engel as chief executive last month after reporting annual losses since 2011 despite a restructuring plan that includes a 30 percent cut in its work force, to around 16,000 people, and a reduction of annual costs by around 400 million euros ($540 million).

"I am very happy with the deal," said Lars Heindorff, an analyst at ABG Sundal Collier, a brokerage firm in Copenhagen. "Having Mitsubishi on board will significantly lower capital expenditure going forward."

Shares in Vestas rose 4.5 percent in Copenhagen on Friday.

The alliance with Mitsubishi was the first major announcement from Vestas's new chief executive, Anders Runevad, a former senior executive at the Swedish technology giant Ericsson. He has pledged to expand Vestas's international and offshore businesses.

The market for offshore wind equipment is dominated by a few suppliers and is less competitive and more profitable than that for onshore turbines, analysts say. The offshore wind projects now under construction are enormous and expensive. For instance, the recently opened London Array, built by Siemens, cost nearly $3 billion.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Creationists on Texas Panel for Biology Textbooks

Drew Anthony Smith for The New York Times

Students and activists marched through the University of Texas in Austin to the State Board of Education's hearing on biology textbooks on Sept. 17.

AUSTIN, Tex. — One is a nutritionist who believes "creation science" based on biblical principles should be taught in the classroom. Another is a chemical engineer who is listed as a "Darwin Skeptic" on the Web site of the Creation Science Hall of Fame. A third is a trained biologist who also happens to be a fellow of the Discovery Institute, the Seattle-based center of the intelligent-design movement and a vice president at an evangelical ministry in Plano, Tex.

Drew Anthony Smith for The New York Times

Ide Trotter, left, a chemical engineer, is among the evolution skeptics on a state review panel.

As Texas gears up to select biology textbooks for use by high school students over the next decade, the panel responsible for reviewing submissions from publishers has stirred controversy because a number of its members do not accept evolution and climate change as scientific truth.

In the state whose governor, Rick Perry, boasted as a candidate for president that his schools taught both creationism and evolution, the State Board of Education, which includes members who hold creationist views, helped nominate several members of the textbook review panel. Others were named by parents and educators. Prospective candidates could also nominate themselves. The state's education commissioner, Michael L. Williams, a Perry appointee and a conservative Republican, made the final appointments to the 28-member panel. Six of them are known to reject evolution.

Some Texans worry that ideologically driven review panel members and state school board members are slowly eroding science education in the state.

"Utterly unqualified partisan politicians will look at what utterly unqualified citizens have said about a textbook and decide whether it meets the requirements of a textbook," lamented Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, which monitors the activities of far-right organizations. The group filed a request for documents that yielded the identities of the textbook review panelists as well as reports containing their reviews.

Publishers including well-known companies like Pearson, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill submitted 14 biology textbooks for consideration this year. Reports from the review panels have been sent to publishers, who can now make changes. Mr. Williams will review the changes and recommend books to the state board. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Williams repeatedly declined requests for an interview. The state board will vote on a final approved list of textbooks in November.

The reports contained comments from Karen Beathard, a senior lecturer in the department of nutrition and food science at Texas A&M University, who wrote in a review of a textbook submitted by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt that "Students should have the opportunity to use their critical thinking skills to weigh the evidence between evolution and 'creation science.' "

In reviews of other textbooks, panel members disputed the scientific evidence, questioning, for example, whether the fossil record actually demonstrates a process of mutation and natural selection over billions of years. "The fossil record can be interpreted in other ways than evolutionary with equal justification," one reviewer wrote. Among the anti-evolution panelists are Ide Trotter, a chemical engineer, and Raymond G. Bohlin, a biologist and fellow of the Discovery Institute.

By questioning the science — often getting down to very technical details — the evolution challengers in Texas are following a strategy increasingly deployed by others around the country.

There is little open talk of creationism. Instead they borrow buzzwords common in education, "critical thinking," saying there is simply not enough evidence to prove evolution.

If textbooks do not present alternative viewpoints or explain what they describe as "the controversy," they say students will be deprived of a core concept of education — learning how to make up their own minds.

Historically, given the state's size, Texas' textbook selections have had an outsize impact on what ended up in classrooms throughout the country. That influence is waning somewhat because publishers can customize digital editions and many states are moving to adopt new science standards with evolution firmly at their center.

Even in Texas, districts can make their own decisions, but many will simply choose books from the state's approved list. "It's a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval," said David Anderson, a former official in the Texas Education Agency, as the department of education is known, and now a consultant who works with textbook publishers.

Four years ago, a conservative bloc on the state school board pushed through amendments to science standards that call for students to "analyze and evaluate" some of the basic principles of evolution. Science educators and advocates worry that this language can be used as a back door for teaching creationism.

"It is like lipstick on a Trojan horse," said Ms. Miller of the Texas Freedom Network.

Parents are worried that their children will not be able to compete for jobs that require scientific backgrounds.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

In BP Trial, the Amount of Oil Lost Is at Issue

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Workers ran skimmers to draw oil out of a marsh in 2010 near Venice, La.

HOUSTON — With billions of dollars in penalties at stake, the civil trial of the British oil company BP begins its second phase on Monday, which will set the amount of oil that spilled into the Gulf of Mexico from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon rig explosion that killed 11 workers and soiled hundreds of miles of beaches.

The government will argue that a total 4.2 million barrels of oil was discharged into the sea over 87 days, the equivalent of nearly one-quarter of all the oil that is consumed in the United States in a day. BP will counter that the number was closer to 2.45 million barrels. This phase of the trial will also determine if BP prepared adequately for a blowout and if it responded properly once the oil started flowing.

Both sides will present their case in Federal District Court in New Orleans using competing technical calculations over the next four weeks. Hanging in the balance are Clean Water Act fines that range from a maximum of $1,100 for every barrel spilled through simple negligence to as much as $4,300 a barrel if a company is found to have been grossly negligent.

"This will be largely a battle of experts," Blaine G. LeCesne, a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans.

The first phase of the trial, which took place over two months this year, centered on whether BP and its contractors were guilty of gross negligence — tantamount to wanton and reckless behavior — in causing the blowout of the Macondo well.

Judge Carl J. Barbier has not ruled yet on the question in the bench trial. But if he agrees with the government's position that there was gross negligence and that 4.2 million barrels was spilled, the fines could amount to more than $18 billion.

"They would have to sell assets to keep the company afloat," said Fadel Gheit, a senior oil analyst at Oppenheimer & Company. "It would wipe out all of their cash."

But if BP's position is upheld that there was simple negligence and only 2.45 million barrels were spilled, then the total fines would amount to no more than $2.7 billion. In all likelihood, a decision or settlement will reach a dollar figure in between, legal experts say.

BP pleaded guilty last year to 14 criminal charges, including manslaughter, and admitted negligence in misreading important tests before the explosion. It also agreed to pay $4.5 billion in fines and other penalties. Four current or former employees also face criminal charges. The company has spent more than $42 billion on cleaning up the environment and compensating victims. People and businesses continue to file claims for damages, and there is no cap to the damages.

The company has struggled to get back on its feet since the accident by divesting itself of less profitable operations and expanding oil production from Angola to the North Sea.

In the early days after the accident, the company took a conciliatory approach to resolve disputes with the gulf states and claims seekers, but it is now taking a more aggressive stance in court. In advertisements, it claims that a multibillion-dollar settlement with victims of the spill has been misinterpreted by the claims administrator. The company has complained bitterly of misconduct within a court-supervised claims program, and last Monday it made a third request to Judge Barbier to suspend settlement payments.

The newest request came a few weeks after the former F.B.I. director Louis Freeh issued a report that found that several staff members of the claims program had taken kickbacks for referrals. Patrick Juneau, the claims administrator, said the improprieties had been isolated. So far, Judge Barbier has rejected BP's requests for a suspension of payments, and Mr. Freeh said the claims center should continue its work despite the irregularities.

The second phase of the trial will determine not only how much oil spilled, but also whether BP was negligent or grossly negligent for not being prepared for a spill and during its efforts to stem the flow of the well between April and July 2010.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dot Earth Blog: Why More Climate Science Hasn’t Led to More Climate Policy – Yet

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 29 September 2013 | 15.50

It's worth offering a bit more context on a point I raised in my morning post on the new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:

Will the fresh assessment of global warming from the panel matter where it counts, in the realm of environmental and energy policy and diplomacy?

In the short run, no. And this is not only because of disinformation campaigns, as some would assert.

Just as the trajectory for climate change at the moment is substantially determined by emissions of greenhouse gases emitted in decades past, prospects for climate legislation or a new international treaty are largely determined by bigger political and diplomatic realities shaped over generations.

President Obama has had to resort to executive steps on climate change, like writing new carbon dioxide regulations, because the path to even modest legislative solutions (as on so many other issues) is blocked by the inevitability of filibusters under the the 60-vote supermajority in the Senate.

In the realm of diplomacy, there is a renewed push, led today in Stockholm by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, to use the findings to accelerate agreement on a new binding climate accord. But there, too, longstanding divisions — most shaped by economics — cut against a science-driven solution. Greenhouse gases from all sources, whether a power plant in Beijing or traffic jam in Los Angeles, mix uniformly. And nearly all growth in emissions will be in Asia over the next several decades.

In 1988, I included the following line in a cover story on global warming for Discover magazine:

Even as the developed nations of the world cut back on fossil fuel use, there will be no justifiable way to prevent the Third World from expanding its use of coal and oil.

The preferred term for such nations is now developing countries, but while the jargon has changed the reality that their top priority is growth has not.

In the long haul, the assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel have made a difference, providing a reliable compass pointing unerringly toward the profound reality of an increasingly human-shaped climate.

It will always be up to societies, balancing a host of factors, to figure out how to respond. The science is only one factor.

But it has provided a sound foundation, and takes away the excuse of ignorance.


15.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Vestas Joins With Mitsubishi for Offshore Turbines

LONDON — The Danish wind turbine manufacturer Vestas received a financial lift on Friday as it announced a joint venture with Mitsubishi Heavy Industry of Japan to develop offshore wind energy.

While Vestas is the world's largest maker of wind turbines, along with General Electric, it has been slow to move into the market for offshore turbines. That has allowed Siemens in Europe to gain an expanding share of the small but fast-growing sector.

The Vestas joint venture with Mitsubishi will develop the Danish company's 8-megawatt offshore turbines, each of which can power roughly 8,000 households. The two companies had been in discussions about a deal for over a year.

Under the terms of the deal, Mitsubishi will invest an initial 100 million euros ($135 million) in the venture, and a further 200 million euros if undisclosed financial targets are met. Vestas and Mitsubishi will initially own equal stakes in the business, but Mitsubishi will have the right to increase its stake to 51 percent beginning in 2016.

Vestas has faced a series of financial difficulties in recent years as it grappled with heightened competition from low-cost Asian rivals and reduced government subsidies for onshore wind power.

The company ousted Ditlev Engel as chief executive last month after reporting annual losses since 2011 despite a restructuring plan that includes a 30 percent cut in its work force, to around 16,000 people, and a reduction of annual costs by around 400 million euros ($540 million).

"I am very happy with the deal," said Lars Heindorff, an analyst at ABG Sundal Collier, a brokerage firm in Copenhagen. "Having Mitsubishi on board will significantly lower capital expenditure going forward."

Shares in Vestas rose 4.5 percent in Copenhagen on Friday.

The alliance with Mitsubishi was the first major announcement from Vestas's new chief executive, Anders Runevad, a former senior executive at the Swedish technology giant Ericsson. He has pledged to expand Vestas's international and offshore businesses.

The market for offshore wind equipment is dominated by a few suppliers and is less competitive and more profitable than that for onshore turbines, analysts say. The offshore wind projects now under construction are enormous and expensive. For instance, the recently opened London Array, built by Siemens, cost nearly $3 billion.


15.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Creationists on Texas Panel for Biology Textbooks

Drew Anthony Smith for The New York Times

Students and activists marched through the University of Texas in Austin to the State Board of Education's hearing on biology textbooks on Sept. 17.

AUSTIN, Tex. — One is a nutritionist who believes "creation science" based on biblical principles should be taught in the classroom. Another is a chemical engineer who is listed as a "Darwin Skeptic" on the Web site of the Creation Science Hall of Fame. A third is a trained biologist who also happens to be a fellow of the Discovery Institute, the Seattle-based center of the intelligent-design movement and a vice president at an evangelical ministry in Plano, Tex.

Drew Anthony Smith for The New York Times

Ide Trotter, left, a chemical engineer, is among the evolution skeptics on a state review panel.

As Texas gears up to select biology textbooks for use by high school students over the next decade, the panel responsible for reviewing submissions from publishers has stirred controversy because a number of its members do not accept evolution and climate change as scientific truth.

In the state whose governor, Rick Perry, boasted as a candidate for president that his schools taught both creationism and evolution, the State Board of Education, which includes members who hold creationist views, helped nominate several members of the textbook review panel. Others were named by parents and educators. Prospective candidates could also nominate themselves. The state's education commissioner, Michael L. Williams, a Perry appointee and a conservative Republican, made the final appointments to the 28-member panel. Six of them are known to reject evolution.

Some Texans worry that ideologically driven review panel members and state school board members are slowly eroding science education in the state.

"Utterly unqualified partisan politicians will look at what utterly unqualified citizens have said about a textbook and decide whether it meets the requirements of a textbook," lamented Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, which monitors the activities of far-right organizations. The group filed a request for documents that yielded the identities of the textbook review panelists as well as reports containing their reviews.

Publishers including well-known companies like Pearson, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill submitted 14 biology textbooks for consideration this year. Reports from the review panels have been sent to publishers, who can now make changes. Mr. Williams will review the changes and recommend books to the state board. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Williams repeatedly declined requests for an interview. The state board will vote on a final approved list of textbooks in November.

The reports contained comments from Karen Beathard, a senior lecturer in the department of nutrition and food science at Texas A&M University, who wrote in a review of a textbook submitted by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt that "Students should have the opportunity to use their critical thinking skills to weigh the evidence between evolution and 'creation science.' "

In reviews of other textbooks, panel members disputed the scientific evidence, questioning, for example, whether the fossil record actually demonstrates a process of mutation and natural selection over billions of years. "The fossil record can be interpreted in other ways than evolutionary with equal justification," one reviewer wrote. Among the anti-evolution panelists are Ide Trotter, a chemical engineer, and Raymond G. Bohlin, a biologist and fellow of the Discovery Institute.

By questioning the science — often getting down to very technical details — the evolution challengers in Texas are following a strategy increasingly deployed by others around the country.

There is little open talk of creationism. Instead they borrow buzzwords common in education, "critical thinking," saying there is simply not enough evidence to prove evolution.

If textbooks do not present alternative viewpoints or explain what they describe as "the controversy," they say students will be deprived of a core concept of education — learning how to make up their own minds.

Historically, given the state's size, Texas' textbook selections have had an outsize impact on what ended up in classrooms throughout the country. That influence is waning somewhat because publishers can customize digital editions and many states are moving to adopt new science standards with evolution firmly at their center.

Even in Texas, districts can make their own decisions, but many will simply choose books from the state's approved list. "It's a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval," said David Anderson, a former official in the Texas Education Agency, as the department of education is known, and now a consultant who works with textbook publishers.

Four years ago, a conservative bloc on the state school board pushed through amendments to science standards that call for students to "analyze and evaluate" some of the basic principles of evolution. Science educators and advocates worry that this language can be used as a back door for teaching creationism.

"It is like lipstick on a Trojan horse," said Ms. Miller of the Texas Freedom Network.

Parents are worried that their children will not be able to compete for jobs that require scientific backgrounds.


15.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

U.N. Climate Panel Endorses Ceiling on Global Emissions

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 28 September 2013 | 15.49

Jonathan Nackstrand/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Ban Ki-moon, the secretary general, addressed the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on Friday.

STOCKHOLM — The world's top climate scientists on Friday formally embraced an upper limit on greenhouse gases for the first time, establishing a target level at which humanity must stop spewing them into the atmosphere or face irreversible climatic changes. They warned that the target is likely to be exceeded in a matter of decades unless steps are taken soon to reduce emissions.

Unveiling the latest United Nations assessment of climate science, the experts cited a litany of changes that were already under way, warned that they were likely to accelerate and expressed virtual certainty that human activity is the main cause. "Climate change is the greatest challenge of our time," said Thomas F. Stocker, co-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations-sponsored group of scientists that produced the report. "In short, it threatens our planet, our only home."

The panel, in issuing its most definitive assessment yet of the risks of human-caused warming, hoped to give impetus to international negotiations toward a new climate treaty, which have languished in recent years in a swamp of technical and political disputes. The group made clear that time was not on the planet's side if emissions continued unchecked.

"Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes," the report said. "It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."

The new report is a 36-page summary for world leaders of a 900-page report that is to be released next week on the physical science of climate change. That will be followed by additional reports in 2014 on the most likely impacts and on possible steps to limit the damage. A draft of the summary leaked last month, and the final version did not change greatly, though it was edited for clarity.

Going well beyond its four previous analyses of the emissions problem, the panel endorsed a "carbon budget" for humanity — a limit on the amount of the primary greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, that can be produced by industrial activities and the clearing of forests. No more than one trillion metric tons of carbon could be burned and the resulting gases released into the atmosphere, the panel found, if planetary warming is to be kept below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) above the level of preindustrial times. That temperature is a target above which scientists believe the most dangerous effects of climate change would begin to occur.

Just over a half-trillion tons have already been burned since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and at the rate energy consumption is growing, the trillionth ton will be burned sometime around 2040, according to calculations by Myles R. Allen, a scientist at the University of Oxford and one of the authors of the new report. More than three trillion tons of carbon are still left in the ground as fossil fuels.

Once the trillion-ton budget is exhausted, companies that wanted to keep burning fossil fuels would have to come up with ways to capture carbon dioxide and store it underground. In the United States, the Obama administration is moving forward with rules that would essentially require such technology, which is likely to be costly, for any future coal-burning power plants; the president's Republican opponents have accused him of waging a "war on coal."

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a worldwide committee of hundreds of scientists that issues major reports every five or six years, advising governments on the latest knowledge on climate change. 

The group has now issued five major reports since 1990, each of them finding greater certainty that the world is warming and greater likelihood that human activity is the chief cause. The new report finds a 95 to 100 percent chance that most of the warming of recent decades is human-caused, up from the 90 to 100 percent chance cited in the last report, in 2007.

But the new document also acknowledges that climate science still contains uncertainties, including the likely magnitude of the warming for a given level of emissions, the rate at which the ocean will rise, and the likelihood that plants and animals will be driven to extinction. The scientists emphasized, however, that those uncertainties cut in both directions and the only way to limit the risk is to limit emissions.

Climate-skeptic organizations assailed the new report as alarmist even before it was published.

The Heartland Institute, a Chicago organization, issued a document last week saying that any additional global warming would likely be limited to a few tenths of a degree and that this "would not represent a climate crisis."

One issue much cited by the climate doubters is the slowdown in global warming that has occurred over the past 15 years. The report acknowledged that it was not fully understood, but said such pauses had occurred in the past and the natural variability of climate was a likely explanation.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dot Earth Blog: Why More Climate Science Hasn’t Led to More Climate Policy – Yet

It's worth offering a bit more context on a point I raised in my morning post on the new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:

Will the fresh assessment of global warming from the panel matter where it counts, in the realm of environmental and energy policy and diplomacy?

In the short run, no. And this is not only because of disinformation campaigns, as some would assert.

Just as the trajectory for climate change at the moment is substantially determined by emissions of greenhouse gases emitted in decades past, prospects for climate legislation or a new international treaty are largely determined by bigger political and diplomatic realities shaped over generations.

President Obama has had to resort to executive steps on climate change, like writing new carbon dioxide regulations, because the path to even modest legislative solutions (as on so many other issues) is blocked by the inevitability of filibusters under the the 60-vote supermajority in the Senate.

In the realm of diplomacy, there is a renewed push, led today in Stockholm by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, to use the findings to accelerate agreement on a new binding climate accord. But there, too, longstanding divisions — most shaped by economics — cut against a science-driven solution. Greenhouse gases from all sources, whether a power plant in Beijing or traffic jam in Los Angeles, mix uniformly. And nearly all growth in emissions will be in Asia over the next several decades.

In 1988, I included the following line in a cover story on global warming for Discover magazine:

Even as the developed nations of the world cut back on fossil fuel use, there will be no justifiable way to prevent the Third World from expanding its use of coal and oil.

The preferred term for such nations is now developing countries, but while the jargon has changed the reality that their top priority is growth has not.

In the long haul, the assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel have made a difference, providing a reliable compass pointing unerringly toward the profound reality of an increasingly human-shaped climate.

It will always be up to societies, balancing a host of factors, to figure out how to respond. The science is only one factor.

But it has provided a sound foundation, and takes away the excuse of ignorance.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Vestas Joins With Mitsubishi for Offshore Turbines

LONDON — The Danish wind turbine manufacturer Vestas received a financial lift on Friday as it announced a joint venture with Mitsubishi Heavy Industry of Japan to develop offshore wind energy.

While Vestas is the world's largest maker of wind turbines, along with General Electric, it has been slow to move into the market for offshore turbines. That has allowed Siemens in Europe to gain an expanding share of the small but fast-growing sector.

The Vestas joint venture with Mitsubishi will develop the Danish company's 8-megawatt offshore turbines, each of which can power roughly 8,000 households. The two companies had been in discussions about a deal for over a year.

Under the terms of the deal, Mitsubishi will invest an initial 100 million euros ($135 million) in the venture, and a further 200 million euros if undisclosed financial targets are met. Vestas and Mitsubishi will initially own equal stakes in the business, but Mitsubishi will have the right to increase its stake to 51 percent beginning in 2016.

Vestas has faced a series of financial difficulties in recent years as it grappled with heightened competition from low-cost Asian rivals and reduced government subsidies for onshore wind power.

The company ousted Ditlev Engel as chief executive last month after reporting annual losses since 2011 despite a restructuring plan that includes a 30 percent cut in its work force, to around 16,000 people, and a reduction of annual costs by around 400 million euros ($540 million).

"I am very happy with the deal," said Lars Heindorff, an analyst at ABG Sundal Collier, a brokerage firm in Copenhagen. "Having Mitsubishi on board will significantly lower capital expenditure going forward."

Shares in Vestas rose 4.5 percent in Copenhagen on Friday.

The alliance with Mitsubishi was the first major announcement from Vestas's new chief executive, Anders Runevad, a former senior executive at the Swedish technology giant Ericsson. He has pledged to expand Vestas's international and offshore businesses.

The market for offshore wind equipment is dominated by a few suppliers and is less competitive and more profitable than that for onshore turbines, analysts say. The offshore wind projects now under construction are enormous and expensive. For instance, the recently opened London Array, built by Siemens, cost nearly $3 billion.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

The Texas Tribune: It’s Not the Rare Birds They Mind So Much. It’s the Watchdogs.

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 27 September 2013 | 15.49

Jerod Foster for The Texas Tribune

Russell Martin, a state wildlife biologist, said that lesser prairie chicken are so synonymous with federal regulation that he won't bring them up to landowners.

LUBBOCK — An odd-looking grouse with an intricate mating dance is at the center of an intense battle over wildlife conservation among energy companies, Texas officials and environmental advocates and the federal government.

But as is frequently the case in debates about threatened species, the private landowner has the most at stake — and often seems absent from the negotiating table.

That is especially true for Texas and the lesser prairie chicken, whose United States population has decreased to 17,000 from 34,000 in the past year. The bird is believed to roam on three million acres of mostly private property in the western portion of the state and the Texas Panhandle. Ranchers own and operate much of the native grassland prairie that the chicken loves, and are crucial to conserving the species. If protections for the chicken are to work, the ranchers must overcome their suspicion of any efforts associated with government.

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service may decide by March whether to list the bird as threatened. Should that happen, landowners could be subject to hefty fines and jail time under the Endangered Species Act if the birds are harmed on their property. Dozens of other species in Texas will be up for such listings in the coming years.

"This is very serious, and it very well could put our 100-year operation out of business," said Evertt Harrel, whose West Texas family cattle ranch has long been a home to lesser prairie chickens. A chunk of it, like many in Texas, is leased for oil and gas activities.

Mr. Harrel's face is familiar to state and federal officials at nearly every public meeting on the topic. But as are most ranchers, he is skeptical of participating in government programs that pay them to conserve land, even though the payments would help offset huge income losses in the face of drought.

"Everybody's just too busy trying to make a living to survive the drought, pay their taxes and put food on the table," said Jeff Haley, who also raises cattle on chicken habitat near the Oklahoma border in the Texas Panhandle. "They're resentful of the fact that outside forces would be trying to tell them what they can and can't do on their own place."

The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and similar agencies in nearby states hope ranchers will embrace an idea known as the Range-wide Plan. Oil and gas companies would offset disturbances to the lesser prairie chicken's habitat by paying landowners a certain amount to maintain the birds' habitat on their own land. The plan aims to quadruple the bird's population without the need for a federal listing.

There is already "some evidence of the interest of the ranching community," said Carter Smith, the Texas department's executive director. More than 500,000 acres of land are already enrolled in voluntary agreements with the federal government to protect ranchers against liability if the bird is listed. But that only represents roughly 60 landowners who have signed such agreements, including Haley.

It does not help that solutions offered to encourage the bird's conservation explicitly mention the lesser prairie chicken, whose name has become synonymous with the threat of federal regulation. The federal Natural Resources Conservation Service has already been paying landowners to conserve habitat across the Southwest, but as news of a possible threatened species listing spread, interest waned.

"If you call it something else, like 'conservation initiative,' they'll sign up," joked Stanley Bradbury, who works in the federal agency's Lubbock office.

Such a name could work because both cattle and the birds are best raised on healthy prairie grassland. The state and the nonprofit Nature Conservancy are working to create a managed refuge of more than 12,000 acres in West Texas for lesser prairie chickens — some of which ranchers could also lease as ideal grassland for cattle grazing.

"What we're doing here really isn't about the prairie chicken," said Russell Martin, a state wildlife biologist. "When I talk to landowners, I won't even bring prairie chickens up unless they bring it up."

The birds thrive in prairies where tall, colorful grasses and weeds dominate. They can nest in the grass, hidden from predators, and eat the seeds of weeds. But if cows eat too much grass, that hurts the sustainability of both ranching operations and the prairie chicken.

So Mr. Martin and Mr. Bradbury often suggest "rotational grazing," or moving cattle from one pasture to another, giving the grass time to recover. By trampling the grass with their hooves, the cattle also pack the soil and promote weed growth — a task historically done by bison running across the prairie.

Prescribed fires could then recreate the natural regeneration process usually done by wildfires. Even oil and gas wells could exist on such land if the density of tall structures that prairie chickens fear is limited.

Mr. Harrel said he and many other ranchers are already using some of these techniques. But he is wary of turning those into contracts with the government, even if it protects him from liability. "You're afraid they're going to move into your house after mowing your yard," he said.

Another approach, proposed by the Environmental Defense Fund and several large oil and gas companies, could be more amenable to government skeptics. That plan also would pay landowners to conserve chicken habitat, but a private foundation would be in charge. Compensation would be based on supply and demand, in a market system known as a "wildlife habitat exchange." Details of the plan are not available, however, because backers say they are "proprietary."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry and the governors of four other Southwestern states have backed the Range-wide Plan, which has gone through four iterations of public comment and drafts. But Susan Combs, the state's comptroller, says that oil and gas interests have too much to lose under that approach. And some wildlife advocates say neither strategy provides enough permanent habitat to the birds.

But all agree that landowners must support whatever conservation measures are put in place, and many think that what happens in Texas could be a model for the country.

"I think it should be the wave of the future," said Joy Zedler, a University of Wisconsin botany professor who has studied the exchange concept for wetlands conservation.

"When one landowner provides resources for the public good," she said, "a little 'thank you' would be nice."


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

National Briefing | New England: Massachusetts: Fishery Group Limits Herring Catch

The New England Fishery Management Council on Thursday approved the region's first cap on the amount of river herring that can be caught by industrial trawlers. According to the rules, which must be approved and put into place by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Atlantic herring fleet can incidentally catch no more than 311.4 metric tons of river herring and shad. The cap, which is the median of what managers estimate it caught over the past five years, will be implemented by zone and gear type. River herring and shad, whose populations are at historic lows, spend part of their lives at sea and run up rivers to spawn; hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on dam removal projects to foster a revival of the runs, but fishermen and conservationists have long warned the species also need protection at sea. The council also discussed the National Marine Fisheries Service's decision this summer not to implement all of the measures the council approved last year to protect Atlantic herring, citing funding issues; the group tabled a motion to prohibit midwater trawling in the region until those rules are put into place.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Industry Still Churns, Even as Cleanup Plan Proceeds for a Canal

But even on the eve of its purging, the Gowanus Canal remains very much a garbage dump for the city. Along the banks of the canal one recent morning, just a tin can's toss from the oily green waters, a giant claw grabbed at a tower of scrap metal, like a crane in an arcade game. In the lot over, delivery trucks idled behind oil storage tanks. Near them, concrete mixers cranked, churned their ingredients and coughed up dust.

"Somebody needs to heat homes and recycle metal and clean out garbage," said Mike Petrosino, co-owner of a fifth-generation, family-owned business that operates Benson Metal, one of two scrap-metal yards that abut the canal and use it for loading and unloading barges. "The canal acts as an infrastructure that supports the city."

Loud, dirty industry has been entwined with the canal for generations, ever since barges delivered brownstone and coal to build Brooklyn's row houses and light its parlor lamps.

The bulk of the pollution was caused by long-closed factories and by decades of untreated sewage carried into the canal by city drains. But businesses currently along the canal have been fingered by the state or environmentalists for sometimes treating the canal like a waste dump. The environmental group Riverkeeper, which monitors local waterways, has in recent months filed lawsuits against Benson Metal, Greco Brothers Concrete, and Sixth Street Iron and Metal, accusing them of violating the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by allowing dirty storm water to run off their sites and into the canal without permits or controls.

Joseph Greco Jr. of Greco Brothers Concrete declined to comment, and his lawyer did not return calls. Sixth Street Iron and Metal has since filed the necessary plans and permit requests, its vice president, Anthony De Conciliis, said.

"We want to be here a long time," Mr. De Conciliis said. "And we believe it's extremely important that we do things that are environmentally sound.

"In the '50s, people would smoke in offices because they didn't think secondhand smoke would harm anybody. We just got to adapt, adapt environmental conservancy into the business. We are a recycling facility at the end of the day."

In a settlement with the state last year, Benson agreed to pay $85,000 for more than 100 instances over 15 months of dropping metal into the water while loading barges. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recently fined Petroleum Tank Cleaners on Butler Street, about a block from the canal, $32,500 for a spill and other violations, according to state records. The company did not respond to messages seeking comment.

A bus company and other businesses owned by Jacob Marmurstein have been fined more than $500,000 for spilling oil, dumping debris into the canal and other violations, state environmental officials said.

Just last month, the bulkhead at Benson collapsed, sending metal junk and concrete blocks into the water.

Riverkeeper, which was out on the canal the day after the collapse, notified the Environmental Conservation Department, which along with the federal Environmental Protection Agency is working with Benson to stabilize the bank and build a new bulkhead.

"It's just another insult," Phillip Musegaas, a program director at Riverkeeper, said of the collapse. "We're talking about a company that is not managing its sites and is not concerned with preventing further environmental hazards."

The issue is also a strain for Mr. Petrosino.

"A good portion of our day is not centered on dealing with the customer and building relationships, but talking about issues of compliance and regulations," said Mr. Petrosino, 42, who began at the company when he was around age 8, riding in the truck next to his father. "It starts to distract you from your core business, which is handling materials." Mr. Petrosino added, "It's one of those obstacles that need to be addressed and handled, and we're doing the best we can."


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fight Over Energy Finds a New Front in a Corner of Idaho

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 26 September 2013 | 15.49

LAPWAI, Idaho — In this remote corner of the Northwest, most people think of gas as something coming from a pump, not a well. But when it comes to energy, remote isn't what it used to be.

The Nez Perce Indians, who have called these empty spaces and rushing rivers home for thousands of years, were drawn into the national brawl over the future of energy last month when they tried to stop a giant load of oil-processing equipment from coming through their lands.

The setting was U.S. Highway 12, a winding, mostly two-lane ribbon of blacktop that bisects the tribal homeland here in North Central Idaho.

That road, a hauling company said in getting a permit for transit last month from the state, is essential for transporting enormous loads of oil-processing equipment bound for the Canadian tar sands oil fields in Alberta.

When the hauler's giant load arrived one night in early August, more than 200 feet long and escorted by the police under glaring lights, the tribe tried to halt the vehicle, with leaders and tribe members barricading the road, willingly facing arrest. Tribal lawyers argued that the river corridor, much of it beyond the reservation, was protected by federal law, and by old, rarely tested treaty rights.

And so the Nez Perce, who famously befriended Lewis and Clark in 1805, and were later chased across the West by the Army ("I will fight no more forever," Chief Joseph said in surrender, in 1877), were once again drawn into questions with no neat answers: Where will energy come from, and who will be harmed or helped by the industry that supplies it?

Tribal leaders, in defending their actions, linked their protest of the shipments, known as megaload transports, to the fate of indigenous people everywhere, to climate change and — in terms that echo an Occupy Wall Street manifesto — to questions of economic power and powerlessness.

"The development of American corporate society has always been — and it's true throughout the world — on the backs of those who are oppressed, repressed or depressed," said Silas Whitman, the chairman of the tribal executive committee, in an interview.

Mr. Whitman called a special meeting of the committee as the transport convoy approached, and announced that he would obstruct it and face arrest. Every other board member present, he and other tribe members said, immediately followed his lead.

"We couldn't turn the cheek anymore," said Mr. Whitman, 72.

The dispute spilled into Federal District Court in Boise, where the Nez Perce, working alongside an environmental group, Idaho Rivers United, carried the day. Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill, in a decision this month, halted further transports until the tribe, working in consultation with the United States Forest Service, could study their potential effect on the environment and the tribe's culture.

The pattern, energy and lands experts said, is clear even if the final outcome here is not: What happens in oil country no longer stays in oil country.

"For the longest time in North America, you had very defined, specific areas where you had oil and gas production," said Bobby McEnaney, a senior lands analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council. A band stretching up from the Gulf of Mexico into the Rocky Mountains was about all there was.

But now, Mr. McEnaney said, the infrastructure of transport and industrial-scale production, not to mention the development of hydraulic fracturing energy recovery techniques, and the proposed Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, are affecting more and more places.

The Nez Perce's stand, in a way, makes Mr. McEnaney's point. The tribe's fight, and the galvanizing decision by its leaders to step in front of the transport, drew in people who had not been involved before.

"Our history is conservative. You don't go to court, you don't fight," said Julian Matthews, another tribe member. The fighting stance by tribal leadership, he said, was partly driven by pressure from members like him, already pledged to opposition.

Others described the board's decision as a thunderbolt. After the special meeting where leaders agreed they would face arrest together, the news blazed through social media on and off the reservation.

"Everybody knew it in an hour," said Angela Picard, who came during the four nights of protest when the load was still on tribal lands, and was one of 28 tribe members arrested.

Pat Rathmann, a soft-spoken Unitarian Universalist church member in Moscow, Idaho, heard the new tone coming from the reservation. A debate over conservation and local environmental impact, she said, had suddenly become a discussion about the future of the planet.

"The least I could do was drive 30 miles to stand at their side," said Ms. Rathmann, whose church has declared climate change to be a moral issue, and recently sponsored a benefit concert in Moscow to raise money for the tribal defense fund.

The equipment manufacturer, a unit of General Electric, asked the judge last week to reconsider his injunction, partly because of environmental impacts of not delivering the loads. Millions of gallons of fresh water risk being wasted if the large cargo — water purification equipment that is used in oil processing — cannot be installed before winter, the company said.

"Although this case involves business interests, underlying this litigation are also public interests surrounding the transportation of equipment produced in the U.S. for utilization in wastewater recycling that benefits the environment," the company said.

The risks to the Nez Perce are also significant in the months ahead. Staking a legal case on treaty rights, though victorious so far in Judge Winmill's court, means taking the chance, tribal leaders said, that a higher court, perhaps in appeal of the judge's decision, will find those rights even more limited than before.

But for tribe members like Paulette Smith, the summer nights of protest are already being transformed by the power of tribe members feeling united around a cause.

"It was magic," said Ms. Smith, 44, who was among those arrested. Her 3-year-old grandson was there with her — too young to remember, she said, but the many videos made that night to document the event will one day help him understand.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Op-Ed Contributor: A Pause, Not an End, to Warming

BERKELEY, Calif. — THE global warming crowd has a problem. For all of its warnings, and despite a steady escalation of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, the planet's average surface temperature has remained pretty much the same for the last 15 years.

As you might guess, skeptics of warming were in full attack mode as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gathered in Sweden this week to approve its latest findings about our warming planet. The skeptics argue that this recent plateau illustrates what they always knew — that complex global climate models have no predictive capability and that, therefore, there is no proof of global warming, human-caused or not.

Greenhouse theorists appear to be on the defensive as they offer different explanations for the letup — that deep ocean water may be draining some warmth from the atmosphere, that increases in high-altitude water vapor may be responsible or that numerous small volcanic eruptions are the cause.

My analysis is different. Berkeley Earth, a team of scientists I helped establish, found that the average land temperature had risen 1.5 degrees Celsius over the past 250 years. Solar variability didn't match the pattern; greenhouse gases did.

As for the recent plateau, I predicted it, back in 2004. Well, not exactly. In an essay published online then at MIT Technology Review, I worried that the famous "hockey stick" graph plotted by three American climatologists in the late 1990s portrayed the global warming curve with too much certainty and inappropriate simplicity. The graph shows a long, relatively unwavering line of temperatures across the last millennium (the stick), followed by a sharp, upward turn of warming over the last century (the blade). The upward turn implied that greenhouse gases had become so dominant that future temperatures would rise well above their variability and closely track carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.

I knew that wasn't the case. The planet warmed by 0.6 degrees over the prior 50 years, but occasional, unexplained temperature fluctuations of as much as 0.3 degrees countered the rise at times and resulted in apparent pauses. Some of the fluctuations might have been caused by shifting ocean currents related to the Gulf Stream and El Niño — the episodic appearance of unusually warm ocean temperatures along the west coast of South America. Here's what I wrote in 2004:

"Suppose... future measurements in the years 2005-2015 show a clear and distinct global cooling trend. (It could happen.) If we mistakenly took the hockey stick seriously — that is, if we believed that natural fluctuations in climate are small — then we might conclude (mistakenly) that the cooling could not be just a random fluctuation on top of a long-term warming trend, since according to the hockey stick, such fluctuations are negligible. And that might lead in turn to the mistaken conclusion that global warming predictions are a lot of hooey. If, on the other hand, we reject the hockey stick, and recognize that natural fluctuations can be large, then we will not be misled by a few years of random cooling."

O.K., I didn't actually predict a pause in the warming but a possible period of cooling. But that's close enough. We are now in that pause, and too many people are taking it too seriously, not just the skeptics and the media but even the greenhouse-warming advocates.

We don't fully understand past variations, but there is a theorem in science: if it happens, it must be possible. The frequent rises and falls, virtually a stair-step pattern, are part of the historic record, and there is no expectation that they will stop, whatever their cause. A realistic prediction simply includes a similar variability as an unexplained component.

Of course, there are scientists who thought they had explained the variability. Previous pauses in temperature rise in 1982 and 1991 were attributed to the ash and sulfur aerosols spewed into the atmosphere by the volcanic eruptions of El Chichón in Mexico and Pinatubo in the Philippines, respectively. I never found those attributions compelling; in particular, the eruption of El Chichón was too small to account for the stall in warming that was attributed to it. I suspect it was more likely that the variations were the result of chaotic changes in ocean currents.

Because of the instability of ocean flow, the best evidence of a changing climate may be the land temperature record. It is full of fits and starts that make the upward trend vanish for short periods. Regardless of whether we understand them, there is no reason to expect them to stop. The best statistical test of an observation is to see if it has happened naturally in the past.

Most of us hope that global warming actually has stopped. (Not everyone; some argue that the warming is good.) Perhaps the negative feedback of cloud cover has kicked in, dampening global warming, or the ocean absorption of atmospheric heat is playing a new and more decisive role.

Alas, I think such optimism is premature. The current pause is consistent with numerous prior pauses. When walking up stairs in a tall building, it is a mistake to interpret a landing as the end of the climb. The slow rate of warming of the recent past is consistent with the kind of variability that some of us predicted nearly a decade ago.

Richard A. Muller is a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of "Energy for Future Presidents."


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bayou Corne Journal: Ground Gives Way, and a Louisiana Town Struggles to Find Its Footing

Courtesy of Jeffrey Dubinsky/Louisiana Environmental Action Network

The Bayou Corne Sinkhole: A video shot by John Boudreaux shows the destructive power of a giant sinkhole in Bayou Corne, La.

BAYOU CORNE, La. — It was nearly 16 months ago that Dennis P. Landry and his wife, Pat, on a leisurely cruise in their Starcraft pontoon boat, first noticed a froth of bubbles issuing from the depths of Bayou Corne, an idyllic, cypress-draped stream that meanders through swampy southern Louisiana. They figured it was a leaky gas pipeline. So did everyone else.

Just over two months later, in the predawn blackness of Aug. 3, 2012, the earth opened up — a voracious maw 325 feet across and hundreds of feet deep, swallowing 100-foot trees, guzzling water from adjacent swamps and belching methane from a thousand feet or more beneath the surface.

"I think I caught a glimpse of hell in it," Mr. Landry said.

Since then, almost nothing here has been the same.

More than a year after it appeared, the Bayou Corne sinkhole is about 25 acres and still growing, almost as big as 20 football fields, lazily biting off chunks of forest and creeping hungrily toward an earthen berm built to contain its oily waters. It has its own Facebook page and its own groupies, conspiracy theorists who insist the pit is somehow linked to the Gulf of Mexico 50 miles south and the earthquake-prone New Madrid fault 450 miles north. It has confounded geologists who have struggled to explain this scar in the earth.

And it has split this unincorporated hamlet of about 300 people into two camps: the hopeful, like Mr. Landry, who believe that things will eventually settle down, and the despairing, who have mostly fled or plan to, and blame their misery on state and corporate officials.

"Everything they're doing, they were forced to do," Mike Schaff, one of those who is leaving, said of the officials. "They've taken no initiative. I wanted to stay here. But the community is basically destroyed."

Drawls Mr. Landry: "I used to have a sign in my yard: 'This too shall pass.' This, too, shall pass. We're not there yet. But I'm a very patient man."

The sinkhole is worrisome enough. But for now, the principal villains are the bubbles: flammable methane gas, surfacing not just in the bayou, but in the swamp and in front and backyards across the area.

A few words of fantastical explanation: Much of Louisiana sits atop an ancient ocean whose salty remains, extruded upward by the merciless pressure of countless tons of rock, have formed at least 127 colossal underground pillars. Seven hundred feet beneath Bayou Corne, the Napoleonville salt dome stretches three miles long and a mile wide — and plunges perhaps 30,000 feet to the old ocean floor.

A bevy of companies has long regarded the dome as more or less a gigantic piece of Tupperware, a handy place to store propane, butane and natural gas, and to make salt water for the area's many chemical factories. Over the years, they have repeatedly punched into the dome, hollowing out 53 enormous caverns.

In 1982, on the dome's western edge, Texas Brine Company sank a well to begin work on a big cavern: 150 to 300 feet wide and four-tenths of a mile deep, it bottomed out more than a mile underground. Until it capped the well to the cavern in 2011, the company pumped in fresh water, sucked out salt water and shipped it to the cavern's owner, the Occidental Chemical Corporation.

Who is to blame for what happened next is at issue in a barrage of lawsuits. But at some point, the well's western wall collapsed, and the cavern began filling with mud and rock. The mud and rock above it dropped into the vacated space, freeing trapped natural gas.

The gas floated up; the rock slipped down. The result was a yawning, bubbling sinkhole.

"You go in the swamp, and there are places where it's coming up like boiling crawfish," said Mr. Schaff, who is moving out.

Mr. Landry, who is staying, agreed — "it looks like boiling water, like a big pot" — but the two men and their camps agree on little else.

Geologists say the sinkhole will eventually stop growing, perhaps at 50 acres, but how long that will take is unclear. The state has imposed tough regulations and monitoring on salt-dome caverns to forestall future problems.

Under state order, Texas Brine has mounted a broad, though some say belated, effort to pump gas out of sandy underground layers where it has spread. Bayou Corne is pocked with freshly dug wells, with more to come, their pipes leading to flares that slowly burn off the methane. That, everyone concedes, could take years.

The two sides greet all that news in starkly different ways.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dot Earth Blog: Hopefully, Hurricane Lull Won’t Blunt Coastal Shifts

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 25 September 2013 | 15.49

This Twitter item that I posted a short while ago says what needs to be said as the New York region heads toward the anniversary of the devastating surge from Hurricane Sandy:

Photo: With hurricane lull, hopefully won't end up in "shock to trance" mode on coastal policy (as with… http://t.co/2ItmF3v78I

— Andy Revkin (@Revkin) 25 Sep 13


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

David Hubel, Nobel-Winning Scientist, Dies at 87

Dr. David Hubel, who was half of an enduring scientific team that won a Nobel Prize for explaining how the brain assembles information from the eye's retina to produce detailed visual images of the world, died on Sunday in Lincoln, Mass. He was 87.

The cause was kidney failure, his son Carl said.

Dr. Hubel (pronounced HUGH-bull) and his collaborator, Dr. Torsten Wiesel, shared the 1981 Nobel in Physiology or Medicine with Roger Sperry for discovering ways that the brain processes information. Dr. Hubel and Dr. Wiesel concentrated on visual perception, initially experimenting on cats; Dr. Sperry described the functions of the brain's left and right hemispheres.

Dr. Hubel's and Dr. Wiesel's work further showed that sensory deprivation early in life can permanently alter the brain's ability to process images. Their findings led to a better understanding of how to treat certain visual birth defects.

Dr. Hubel and Dr. Wiesel collaborated for more than two decades, becoming, as they made their discoveries, one of the best-known partnerships in science.

"Their names became such a brand name that H&W rolled off the tongue as easily in the lab as A&W root beer did at lunch," Robert H. Wurtz, a neuroscientist, wrote in a review article about their work.

Before Dr. Hubel and Dr. Wiesel started their research in the 1950s, scientists had long believed that the brain functioned like a movie screen — projecting images exactly as they were received from the eye. Dr. Hubel and Dr. Wiesel showed that the brain behaves more like a microprocessor, deconstructing and then reassembling details of an image to create a visual scene.

By measuring the electrical impulses of cells in the visual cortex, the scientists discovered that cells respond to straight lines, movement and contrast — features that delineate objects in the environment. They further found that some cells fire rapidly in response to horizontal lines, while other cells prefer vertical lines or angles. Cells with similar functions are organized into columns, they said, tiny computational machines that relay information to a higher region of the brain, where a visual image is formed.

Dr. Hubel and Dr. Wiesel also found that vision does not develop normally if the brain fails to make connections with the eye during a critical window early in life.

In a 1962 experiment, the scientists showed that kittens that had one eye sewn shut after birth became blind in that eye because their brains were deprived of visual stimulation. In a related experiment, the scientists showed that exposure to light did not by itself provide enough stimulation; it was necessary for newborn animals to see the patterns and contours of the world around them.

Doctors now operate on infants born with cataracts early in life to prevent vision loss; before Dr. Hubel's and Dr. Wiesel's research, doctors removed cataracts from infants between ages 6 months and 24 months, with poor results. The research also led to earlier treatment for strabismus, a condition in which the eyes are not properly aligned.

Scientists have since found evidence of similar "critical periods" in hearing and language acquisition.

"David and Torsten did more than open up the study of the primary visual cortex; they laid the basis of all that was to follow in the sensory systems," Dr. Eric R. Kandel, a Nobel laureate, wrote in a recent commentary about their research. "Together this body of work stands as one of the great biological achievements of the 20th century."

David Hunter Hubel was born in Windsor, Ontario, on Feb. 27, 1926, to American parents. His father was a chemical engineer. Dr. Hubel grew up in Montreal, where his boyhood hobbies included chemistry. He once rocked his neighborhood by firing a small cannon in the middle of his street; in another experiment, he launched a hydrogen balloon that was found by a farmer's daughter 100 miles away.

He went to McGill University, where he studied math and physics because he preferred solving problems to memorizing facts. But after earning his bachelor's degree in 1947, he decided against a career in mathematics. "To make it in that field required a virtuosity — like becoming a concert pianist — that I probably lacked," he told an interviewer.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Unilever to Buy Oil Derived From Algae From Solazyme

In a sign of the growing mainstream acceptance of products derived from algae, Unilever, the consumer products giant, has agreed to buy large amounts of oil from Solazyme, a start-up that bioengineers algae to produce oils, proteins and complex sugars, executives said Tuesday.

Jim Wilson/The New York Times

A fermentation machine producing algae used to make oil at the Solazyme plant in South San Francisco, Calif.

Unilever said it would use the oil for its personal care products, which include Dove and Brylcreem. The agreement, under which Unilever plans to buy roughly three million gallons of the algae-produced oil over 12 to 18 months starting early next year, is part of its aim to double the size of its business while reducing its overall environmental footprint. Toward that end, Unilever has said it will use only sustainable agricultural raw materials by 2020, a goal it met last year in its purchases of palm oil from sustainable sources.

For Solazyme, the agreement represents an important step as it ramps up to commercial-scale production. Originally conceived as a fuel business, Solazyme has focused on making oils for products with higher profit margins like personal care, food and petrochemicals.

The Unilever oil, developed in a five-year partnership with Solazyme, will be made at a plant it built in Brazil with Bunge, a leading agribusiness and food company. When fully operational, the plant could produce roughly 30 million gallons of oil a year.

"This is the first oil that was jointly developed that's going to a product sale," said Jonathan S. Wolfson, Solazyme's chief executive. "We've laid out the path for years, and now we're closing the first big loop about where a big chunk of this oil goes coming out of one of these plants."

Solazyme, based in South San Francisco, Calif., has developed several strains of microalgae that can produce oils, proteins and complex sugars with specific characteristics to perform a variety of functions. Though it still plans to mass-market fuel, it has entered into partnerships with established companies to help it increase manufacturing capacity for its several product lines.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

In Bronx River, Helping Oysters Stage Comeback

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 24 September 2013 | 15.49

The oyster did.

Oysters clung tenaciously to tires here and there, a tiny remnant of the vast oyster reefs that once thrived in New York City's waterways and nourished natives and settlers alike. Now after decades of cleanup efforts in the river, the oyster has emerged as a tangible measure of how much more needs to be done to return the river closer to its natural state.

A one-acre oyster reef has been created in the river just off the shore of Soundview Park in the South Bronx — one of the largest oyster restoration projects in the city. On Saturday, students from the Urban Assembly New York Harbor School relocated about 100,000 farm-raised baby oysters, known as spat-on-shell, to the reef, which was made this summer by piling 100 tons of empty shells on the river's muddy bottom.

These Bronx oysters are not destined for the dinner plate or coveted as a source of pearls, but instead are prized for their ability to filter pollutants and anchor a marine ecosystem with their craggy reefs.

"They're ecological engineers," said Dennis Suszkowski, science director of the Hudson River Foundation in Lower Manhattan, which is overseeing the oyster reef in the Bronx River. "Oysters will grow on top of one another and create a three-dimensional habitat with all sorts of nook and crannies for fish to feed and use as shelter. It's the kind of habitat that was once here that is no longer here."

The project builds upon more than a decade of painstaking oyster research and experimentation in the New York region, which once had mile upon mile of oyster beds that supplied oyster houses, saloons and even street carts across the city before they largely disappeared, victims of overharvesting and pollution, according to scientists.

NY/NJ Baykeeper, a nonprofit organization, has recruited volunteers to tend so-called oyster gardens — small clusters of oysters in metal cages — in their own communities. In 2013, the program expanded to 45 sites in the region, up from 30 last year.

But such restoration efforts still have a long way to go. The Urban Assembly New York Harbor School, a public high school on Governors Island that started an oyster farm in 2008, has raised just over two million of the billion baby oysters that it intends to provide for restoration projects, including the one in the Bronx River.

"It's a huge challenge," said Pete Malinowski, a teacher who oversees the school's oyster program. "We're still scratching the surface in trying to figure out what it means and how we should do it. It's very early on."

Though there were some wild oysters in the Bronx River, they did not survive in any significant number until a small pilot reef was built there in 2006 by the city parks department and community and environmental groups. The reef was cobbled together from clam shells, which are more readily available than oyster shells. Some of the shells washed away. More were piled on. Soon wild oysters floating by attached themselves to the shells. Spat-on-shell were added to the budding population.

"We saw that the oysters survived, and that we had successfully created a beneficial habitat, so we decided we should promote this site and do more," said Marit Larson, director of wetlands restoration for the parks department.

In 2010, the Hudson River Foundation and NY/NJ Baykeeper led a coalition of more than 30 governmental agencies and scientific organizations to test experimental oyster reefs in six locations around the city, including the Bronx River, Jamaica Bay and near Great Kills Harbor in Staten Island.

The Bronx oysters thrived, and the coalition secured $165,000 in grants to build a larger reef there in June.

Throughout the summer, researchers and environmentalists pulled on their waders and trudged into the river to check on the new reef. On one trip, the soft, shifting river bottom sucked at their waders like quicksand.

"You have to keep walking because there's no real bottom, at least that we can find," said Damian Griffin, education director of the Bronx River Alliance. "As soon as your ankle goes down, you have to really work to get it out."

The oyster has been embraced by community groups in the Bronx, where it serves as a positive counterpoint to the much-publicized pollution of the river. Rocking the Boat, a nonprofit youth development organization, has introduced the oyster to high school students as a way to teach them science and history. It has even provided samples to taste — from Whole Foods, not from the river.

Chrissy Word, the group's director of public programs, said most of the students had never stepped foot in the river before helping to monitor and track the growth of oysters there.

"The vast majority of them think the Bronx River is a terribly dangerous place because it used to be," she said, citing the pollution and debris that were once its hallmark. "You still can't eat the fish, but the positive thing is we can use it in many ways we couldn't before."

For some, the river is fit again not only for oysters, but also for humans.

Justin Fornal, the host of "The Culinary Adventures of Baron Ambrosia" on the Cooking Channel, swam by the new oyster reef in July to call attention to the river as a natural resource for the borough. He said he was warned by friends that he might "come out with extra body parts."

Mr. Fornal, 35, recalled looking down and seeing abandoned objects like dolls, tires, radios and air-conditioners buried in the silt, seemingly frozen in time. But he also swam through clear, deep stretches that reminded him of the ocean.

"There are those who would disagree with me that it's clean enough to swim in," he said. "But I felt great after the swim. I didn't get as much as a cold."


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Study Sees a Higher Risk of Storms on the Horizon

The eastern and central United States likely will see a greater risk of severe weather by the middle of this century as rising temperatures trigger atmospheric changes that favor storms, a new study by climate scientists from Stanford and Purdue universities concludes.

By the century's final 30 years, the study forecasts, the eastern United States could experience severe thunderstorms an average of nearly 7.5 spring days, an increase of almost 42 percent. A 15 percent increase is forecast during June, July and August.

The largest single increase, an average of more than 2.4 days, was likely from March through May across parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana.

The study's data suggest — but do not flatly predict — that the number of days with conditions favorable to tornadoes will increase as well.

The peer-reviewed findings, by Noah S. Diffenbaugh and Martin Scherer of Stanford and Robert J. Trapp of Purdue, were published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The results were consistent across 10 different models that scientists worldwide use to estimate the impact of climate change, Dr. Diffenbaugh said in an interview.

The study measured the impact of projected increases in temperature on conditions that are known to produce severe thunderstorms. It makes theoretical projections of changes in those conditions daily — and even for parts of a day — throughout the rest of the century.

The calculations, never before made at such minute levels, required the use of computers at climate-change research centers around the world, Dr. Diffenbaugh said.

"We can look starting in the recent past and analyze how many severe thunderstorm environments there are in each model, in each year, all the way out to the end of 21st century," he said.

All 10 models projected an overall increase in potential severe-weather days in the spring and autumn after about 2040. In some models, the risk of storms was found to decrease in part of the nation centered on Kansas and Nebraska, and only in summer.

The authors cautioned that some elements of thunderstorm formation, such as processes that stimulate atmospheric convection, were not included in their study. And they stressed that the conditions they did include are conducive to severe storms, but do not guarantee them.

Harold Brooks, a senior research scientist at the National Severe Storms Laboratory in Norman, Okla., called the findings "really intriguing," noting that the study's season-by-season analysis may add significantly to past studies that generally had made yearly predictions.

Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., a second scientist whose own research has foreshadowed some of the findings, said he believes the study "actually underplays the worries."

The likelihood of severe weather is "probably fairly robust and the prospects worrying," he said in an e-mail.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which tallies severe-weather events that cause more than $1 billion in damage, recorded 13 such events in 2011 and 2012 involving thunderstorms and tornadoes. Those storms killed 628 people and caused nearly $45 billion in damage.

Various weather conditions help spawn thunderstorms, but among the most important are humidity, vertical wind shear and atmospheric instability, which can cause warm air to rush upward through colder air.

Because hot air can hold more moisture than cold air, rising temperatures ensure greater humidity in the future. The study predicted that the amount of energy available for a storm, called convective available potential energy, would also become more frequent as temperatures rise.

The number of days with wind shear likely would decrease, the study found — but almost all the decline would be on days when the air was calm, and thunderstorms were unlikely in any case. During periods of storm-spawning instability, the chances of wind shear were reported to rise.

That last point, which Dr. Diffenbaugh called a key finding, addresses questions about the projected decline in wind shear that have led some to question the link between higher temperatures and an increase in severe weather.

By some measures, severe weather has been on the rise in recent years, a development that some have attributed to climate change. Dr. Diffenbaugh said the study draws no such conclusion; the 10 models employed in the study did not reach general agreement on an increase in severe-weather days until about 2040, he said.

"We have a real challenge in trying to understand whether or not there have been changes in the likelihood of occurrence in the recent past," he said. While temperatures have been assiduously recorded, he said, records of storms and tornadoes are considerably murkier.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Cargo Ship Docking at Space Station Is Delayed

A commercial cargo spacecraft, which was to dock at the International Space Station on Sunday, will not make its second attempt until at least Saturday. It is the first flight of the unmanned Cygnus cargo ship built by Orbital Sciences of Dulles, Va. Orbital said it fixed the software glitch that aborted the approach, but a traffic jam — three astronauts are to arrive on a Russian Soyuz on Wednesday — will delay the docking.


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

In the Shadow of ‘Old Smokey,’ a Toxic Legacy

Written By Unknown on Senin, 23 September 2013 | 15.49

William DeShazer for The New York Times

Friends play basketball at a park adjacent to the site of Old Smokey, a Miami trash incinerator that shut down in 1970.

MIAMI — When she was little, Elaine Taylor remembers rushing home whenever Old Smokey fired up. Clouds of ash from the towering trash incinerator would fill the air and settle on the ramshackle houses and the yards of the West Grove neighborhood.

Her mother, who took in laundry, would be whipping sheets and shirts off the clotheslines. Often, the soot would force Elaine and her mother to wash everything again, by hand.

Old Smokey was shut down in 1970, after 45 years of belching ash, but its legacy might be more ominous than mere memories of soiled laundry. Residents of the neighborhood, established by Bahamian immigrants in the 1880s, have become alarmed by recent revelations that soil samples there show contamination from carcinogens like arsenic and heavy metals, including lead, cadmium and barium.

Ash from the old incinerator is being blamed, and residents are asking why none of this came to light sooner.

"They didn't want to let it be known, so they kept it hush-hush," said Delphine Sweatman, who has lived in the same house for 40 years and has stopped taking her three grandchildren to local parks. "I don't think that's right."

Miami officials discovered contamination two years ago at the site of Old Smokey, now a training center for firefighters, but they did not alert residents of the area. A report on the findings remained under wraps until a city employee revealed its existence this year to a University of Miami law professor, Anthony V. Alfieri, who directs the law school's Environmental Justice Project.

Once the presence of toxins was made public, officials scrambled to commission tests of soil samples in the immediate area. They later expanded the investigation to include 7 parks, 17 private properties, 4 churches and 12 green spaces in the West Grove and in adjoining Coconut Grove, as well as in Coral Gables, a separate municipality.

At a briefing for residents last week, Wilbur Mayorga, a Miami-Dade County environmental official, said testing results suggested that the amount of toxins in the West Grove sites was "unlikely to cause illness," and that arsenic, for instance, can occur naturally in the area's soil and limestone. Marc Sarnoff, a Miami commissioner, said the West Grove had received "a clean bill of health."

"Everything is testing to be residential standard," Mr. Sarnoff said, referring to contaminant levels permitted under environmental regulations.

That may not be the final word. A cancer researcher at the University of Miami said that she and several colleagues discovered a cluster of pancreatic cancer cases in the West Grove several years ago.

"That's the little region that lights up," said the researcher, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicate nature of the issue. Although she found the discovery "puzzling," she said she did not pursue it because of a lack of funds. But when she read a newspaper article this year about Old Smokey that said its ash had spewed arsenic and heavy metals into the neighborhood, she said "everything started making sense."

The researcher noted that no correlation could be established between the cancer cluster and the old incinerator without more research.

In any event, some longtime residents now have at least a clue as to what might have made them sick. "I'm dying of cancer," said Vernon Clark, 77, who once ran for a city commission seat. "My brother has cancer," said Mr. Clark, who walks slowly, using a golf club as a cane. "My mother died of it."

Residents recall that red-hot ash from Old Smokey, which could pulverize and burn 300 tons of trash a day, sometimes sparked fires on nearby roofs and in trees. In the 1950s, according to The Miami Herald, pilots descending toward Miami International Airport resorted to instrument landings when the smoke became too dense.

"There were a lot of people living around that thing — they were not protected," said Marion Culmer Wright, 86, who remains in the dusty frame house where her parents married in 1917. She remembers the soot on the eight Australian pines her father had planted, one for each of his children, that were later taken down when the city widened the road.

Across the street from Old Smokey's former site lies Esther Mae Armbrister Park and its playground. Down the block is George Washington Carver Elementary School, a once all-black institution that traces its history to 1899. Former students recall ash blowing in through the school's open windows.

Professor Alfieri said that the construction of Old Smokey "in the middle of a Jim Crow community" in 1925 exemplified the city's pattern of neglecting the West Grove, an area that has never experienced the prosperity so evident in its neighboring communities. In a 1950 article in Ladies' Home Journal, Marjory Stoneman Douglas wrote that when the city installed a water and sewage system in Coconut Grove, its western neighbor was left out of the project, and for years residents continued to use wells and outhouses.

Paradoxically, the worst toxin levels found in the recent testing were not in the West Grove but in Coconut Grove's Blanche Park, the site of a popular playground and a dog park. Workers removed lead-contaminated soil this month and paved over a parking lot, and officials declared the problem contained.

"My daughter learned to crawl in that sand," said Dawn McCarthy, the mother of two girls who frequented Blanche Park. "We're all praying there's nothing wrong, but we're terrified. None of us go to that park anymore."


15.49 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger